Create the problem..

Provide the “solution”.

London refuses to address the problem of Muslim extremism.  Their approach is to pretend it’s not happening and consequently, we get massacres like yesterday.

The people of London and the world who support this approach are simply ignorant fools, manipulated into believing that tolerance should extend to people that want to murder you.

However, people like Prime Minister Theresa May and Angela Merkel and Barack Obama, etc etc specifically use this approach not out of ignorance, but rather out of dark, assured certainty that slaughters like yesterday will occur.  

And with all that planning comes preparedness to offer a solution.  So when Muslim extremists brutally slaughter innocent Britons by ramming them with a car and then cutting their throats, the answer isn’t to take a long hard look at Briton’s open door immigration policy.  It’s not to dismantle the Muslim ghettos that have been formed by immigrants who are unwilling to assimilate.  It’s not a promise to crack down on terrorist cells within the UK and it sure as hell isn’t a promise to review the U.S./U.K. foreign policy that insists on constantly meddling in the Middle East.

No, what Therese May and all of the criminal politicians who stand by her have to offer is internet regulation.

New international agreements should be introduced to regulate the internet in the light of the London Bridge terror attack, Theresa May has said.

The Prime Minister said introducing new rules for cyberspace would “deprive the extremists of their safe spaces online” and that technology firms were not currently doing enough.

The Prime Minister made the comments outside Downing Street on Sunday morning in the aftermath of the van and knife attack that saw seven people killed and dozens injured.

“We cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed – yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that provide internet-based services provide,” Ms May said.

Critical thinking skills time.  For starters, the U.K. is the U.S.’ lapdog in every sense:  Foreign policy, military and intelligence services.  They do what we tell them to.  In return, they have access to many (but not all) of our services and assets.  The NSA performs bulk collection of all U.K. data traffic, just as they do with the United States (illegally of course in both countries).  The NSA can track, manipulate or knock out any online terrorist recruiting or propaganda off of social media or independent sites.  This law will be used to censor free speech even further in the U.K. and it will be aimed specifically at those who are critical of the government and their approach at dealing with this radical Islamic threat.

Action–>Reaction–>Solution.  They conspire to create all three.  Every time.