In case you weren’t paying attention..

…The 1st amendment is dead.  You don’t get to speak out against the wrong people without punishment.  Sometimes you don’t even have to speak out, you just have to discuss the worst kept secret in all of politics:   Hillary Clinton’s health.

Six days ago, Dr. Drew Pinsky (or just “Dr. Drew”) commented on Hillary Clinton’s health.  Pinsky is not a conservative and at least at one time, was a registered Democrat.  In other words, this was not a politically motivated attack.

Drew was interviewed on August 19th by radio station KABC, and stated that he is “gravely concerned” about her health:

-He said Clinton had two episodes of deep venus thrombosis, or blood clots in her legs, and suffers from hypothyroidism. He said the drug she was given for hypothyroidism was “very unconventional” and used in the 60s. Pinsky then said Clinton was put on an anticoagulant that “really isn’t used anymore,” adding that a person of Clinton’s stature would be expected to receive a newer drug.

-After Clinton fell and hit her head in 2012, she suffered a “transverse sinus thrombosis,” which he called an “exceedingly rare clot” that he has only come across once in his career.  He went on to state that the prism glasses that Hillary wore for several months is indicative of brain damage: “that is brain damage, and so that’s affecting her balance….tell us a little more about that – that’s profound.”

Two days later, KABC pulled the interview from their website.  Gone.  Poof.  It never existed.

Dr. Drew’s twitter went dark.  No tweets for a week.

Today, his TV show was cancelled.

Those of you who have supported Democrats year after year, this is on you.  This kind of suppression isn’t brand new, it’s just more visible now because these days they don’t even bother trying to hide it.  You had plenty of chances to speak out against Progressive’s special brand fascism but you did nothing but continue to support your tribe.  And this is only going to become worse if you damned fools elect this woman.


Burying the lead…

Congressman Says Some of Clinton Emails ‘Classified’ Simply to Avoid Embarrassment – Lawnews

A pretty “ho-hum” headline, right?  Except buried a few pages down:

“Hillary Clinton is out there saying there’s not very much sensitive information in there, that she didn’t trade in sensitive classified information. It’s so sensitive and so classified that even I as the chairman of the Oversight Committee don’t have the high level of clearance to see what’s in those materials,” Chaffetz told the panel.

And yet somehow, she wasn’t indicted.  Much like the FBI’s decision on their recommendations to the Justice Department, voting for this woman is utterly indefensible.

I’m still waiting for someone in the media to ask why Hillary chose to put all of this highly sensitive data on private servers.


The real face of terror..


Early last week, an enormous document dump of Soros’ private files became publicly available.  The media half-heartedly covered it for a day, and then it was gone.

As usual, what the Media doesn’t report on is often far more important than the information it does.  As I have stated on this blog for years, this man is nothing less than an architect of the destruction of the West.  The data that was leaked confirms my words.

The documents confirm that Soros has:

-Influenced and rigged elections in Europe

-Funded (along with the U.N.) the migrant crisis with the intent of destroying Europe and the United States and creating Global Governance

-Funded extremist groups

-Targeted those who disagreed with paid attacks

-Shape and dictate foreign policy for multiple governments

-Paid off Congressmen and Secretaries of State

-Manipulated media coverage during the Ukraine crisis in 2014 to influence public opinion and gain support for a “New Ukraine”

-Alter Supreme Court Rulings

-Funded campaigns to create division and abject hatred between different groups within Europe and the United States.

Those are some pretty big items, eh?  Those are crimes and actions that any sensible person would think are worth covering.  But the MSM did not.  What does that tell you about who owns the MSM?  The story itself simply confirms what many of us already knew.  Perhaps the bigger story is the lack of coverage.  But we will cover it here.

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents  – Investor’s Business Daily

Soros Paid Al Gore MILLIONS To Push ‘Aggressive US Action’ On Global Warming – Daily Caller

Leaked Soros Memo: Refugee Crisis ‘New Normal,’ Gives ‘New Opportunities’ For Global Influence – Daily Caller

Hacked documents show George Soros’ foundation ‘tried to influence the Supreme Court justices on immigration case’ – UK Daily Mail

Full list of Soros NGOs manipulating elections in all EU member states – Linkis

Leaked Memos Soros Advances Jihad On Western Civilization – Infowars

 The Globalists can be defeated so easily if we’re all awake and aware.  That’s all it takes.  They take over by stealth because they have to.  They turn us against one another so we don’t fight them.

But if we’re awake, their attempts to divide us become obvious to everyone.  The United States and Europe can take their countries back if those of us who are awake can rouse the rest of our countrymen.


Dr. Drew speaks out on Hillary’s health…

…or did he?

There was a pretty good buzz yesterday where celeb doctor Drew Pinsky commented on Hillary Clinton’s obvious health issues.  Drew, far from being a conservative had some rather grave concerns about Clinton’s health in an interview with 790 KABC.  Except, now it’s gone.

And if not for conservative and libertarian media, you’d never know it existed.  A Google search for “Dr. Drew on Hillary Clinton’s Health” doesn’t list a single MSM or other left-leaning site on the entire first two pages of results.

We’ve never seen anything like this before.  The media and their controllers are so desperate to get Hillary in and more importantly, keep Trump out that they’re not even pretending to be journalists any longer.  Maybe it’s better this way, at least there’s some honesty now.

Can the 2016 election be rigged? You bet – The Hill

Donald Trump has said publicly that he fears the next election will be rigged. Based both on technical capability and recent history, Trump’s concerns are not unfounded.

A recent study by Stanford University proved that Hillary Clinton’s campaign rigged the system to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.

What was done to Bernie Sanders in Wisconsin is stunning.

Why would the Clintons not cheat again?

The issue here is both voter fraud, which is limited but does happen, and election theft through the manipulation of the computerized voting machines, particularly the DIEBOLD/PES voting machines in wide usage in most states.

POLITICO profiled a Princeton professor — who has demonstrated how the electronic voting machines that are most widely used can be hacked in five minutes or less! Robert Fitrakis Professor of Political Science in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department at Columbus State Community College has written a must-read book on the strip and flip technique sued to rig these machines. Professor Fitrakis is a Green Party activist.

A computer hacker showed CBS how to vote multiple times using a simple $15.00 electronic device.

To be very clear both parties have engaged in this skullduggery and it is the party in power in each state that has custody of the machines and control of their programing. This year, the results of machines in Pennsylvania, Virginia and Ohio, where Governor John Kasich controls the machines, must be matched with exit polls, for example.

Stone gets into the finer details on exactly how this has been accomplished in the past.  Read the whole thing.

Donald Trump Just Overtook The Democrats On Gay Rights – Breitbart / Milo

There are a ton of positively money quotes in this article so please read the whole thing.  But for a taste:

God-Emperor Daddy — known to the rest of you as Republican presidential candidate Donald J Trump — has just outflanked Hillary Clinton on the Left and announced what can only be described as an ultra-progressive immigration policy.  I don’t mean progressive as it has come to be used, of course — nannying, language-policing, Muslim-pandering. I mean it’s a policy that could actually make things better for minorities.  Trump’s plan is to introduce a screening process for prospective immigrants to the U.S., testing their ideological commitment to western values like women’s rights, gay rights, and religious pluralism. It’s a brilliant plan. I’m especially inclined to say it’s brilliant because it may have been partly inspired by me.

The media won’t portray this policy as progressive, of course — they’ll portray it as stupid, bigoted, and reactionary. The Washington Post, little more than a Hillary mouthpiece this election cycle, has already started, branding the proposal “crazy” and “outlandish.” But it isn’t.  Actually, it’s about the most pro-gay policy I’ve ever heard from a presidential hopeful.

And perhaps the best quote of all:

I’m comfortable with people who are uncomfortable with gays, as long as they don’t want to kill us, maim us or throw us off rooftops. (Permission for lesser violence is available upon application.) For leftists, the reverse appears to be true — they’re uncomfortable with people who are uncomfortable with gays, unless they want to kill us and maim us and throw us off rooftops.

Thus, decline to bake a cake for some lesbians and you are a heinous bigot. Murder 50 fags and injure 50 more and you’re a tragic victim, probably reacting to islamophobia, whose dad will be invited to stand behind Hillary Clinton at a rally.

And one more for good measure:

Throughout this election cycle, Trump has been attacked as a bigot and a reactionary on immigration. With this new plan, though, he has proven beyond doubt that he’s the only person running for President who can stick up for chicks and queers.

Face facts, guys. It is the political Left that wants to flood America with violent homophobes and misogynists, not Trump. No-one with a clear-eyed view of Muslim culture can believe otherwise.

How did we reach this point?  How did we arrive at a place where so many people have been convinced that anything less than total submission to the whims of others is racism?

And one more semi-related note, I’ve seen some of the internal, real polling.  Folks, it’s not even close right now among likely voters.  The DNC and the Media are perpetuating this meme that the election is tightly contested so that if they manage to steal it at the ballot box, your expectations will have been artificially set to believe it’s anyone’s race.

It’s not.  And WikiLeaks isn’t done yet, either.  They’re saving the best for last.  Of course, that’s if the Media doesn’t convince you to focus your energy on who leaked the data (those darn Russians!!) instead of the actual data itself.