National sheriffs’ group, opposed to federal laws on guns and taxes, calls for defiance – Washington Post

Local police chiefs and sheriffs typically swear to enforce the laws of their state. But a group called the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association is intent on strictly enforcing their view of the U.S. Constitution and, according to a long new piece by the Center for Public Integrity, “its ambition is to encourage law enforcement officers to defy laws they decide themselves are illegal.” In essence, they are troubled by the overreach of the federal government in matters concerning guns, taxes and land management, and founder Richard Mack has described the federals as “the greatest threat we face today,” and his association as “the army to set our nation free.”

In an interview with Julia Harte and former Post reporter R. Jeffrey Smith, Mack said he had enlisted “several hundred” of the more than 3,000 sheriffs around the country as members of the CSPOA, and that hundreds more are sympathetic. At the association’s 2014 convention, dozens of sheriffs signed a declaration that they would not tolerate any federal agent who attempted to register firearms, arrest someone or seize property in their counties without their consent.

Don’t paint the police with a broad brush.  Yes, there are scumbags in our police ranks and they need to be removed from their positions as law officers.  But for every piece of shit, there’s three good ones that genuinely care about their community, dispense the law fairly and understand that being a law officer means holding themselves to an even higher standard than the citizens they protect.  The men referenced in the article above are firmly in the latter category.


Hint:  It’s not “effective security”.

The work of our two Committees has documented a recurring pattern of mismanagement and waste at the Transportation Security Administration.  Add to this an unending string of video clips, photographs and news reports about inappropriate, clumsy and even illogical searches and screenings by TSA agents.  Americans are right to demand answers from TSA about the return on investment of their tax dollars.
Monday’s joint Committee hearing represents yet another opportunity for TSA to try to explain why Americans are subjected to procedures that sometimes appear to defy logic and why the agency continues on a security system procurement binge.  The committee will be asking questions about the effectiveness of five major security initiatives that together represent billions dollars of government spending.  Understanding the cost for security programs as well as their benefits will help address the question: is it security theater or effective security?

Also, check out this video from Info Wars: TSA: Misconduct At The Highest Levels

-95% of the guns unmarked agents have attempted to smuggle through security have successfully gotten through.

-TSA employees have stolen over 30 million dollars in passenger belongings.

They have not caught a single terrorist.

So the TSA is not about security.  What it is about:

-Convincing you there’s a serious terrorist threat around every corner so that you’ll be more willing to allow all encompassing, unconstitutional domestic spying.

-Getting you comfortable with giving up your rights, specifically the 4th Amendment of the Constitution

-Brain-washing fathers everywhere that they should tolerate their wives and children being groped by human excrement dressed in a blue uniform.

It is nothing but expensive theatre meant to program you.


Limited Hangout

From Wikipedia:

A limited hangout or partial hangout is, according to former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Victor Marchetti, “spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”

This is what we’re seeing with the ridiculous buzz regarding the 28 classified 9/11 pages and Saudi Arabia’s involvement.

There are certain concepts that I try very diligently to get across to the audience here at this blog.  One of them I haven’t talked directly about in the past but it bears mentioning now:

There is no organic reporting on the part of the Mainstream Media.  None.

Every major story revolves around pushing someone’s agenda to the masses.  Taking my word on that, the question you should now be asking yourself is:  Why are we being directed to hate Saudi Arabia?

Who knows?  I don’t.  But it’s very clear that’s the endgame.  It’s not as if the Federal Government is going to give us genuine 9/11 truth.  The cabal doesn’t try very hard to hide what they’re doing these days so my guess is that it will become apparent soon.

And by the way, don’t sweat it that Saudi Arabia is threatening to pull $750 billion dollars worth of assets out of the U.S. Economy and crash it if the 28 documents are declassified and they’re found to be partially at blame for the 9/11 terror attacks.  If the bill was passed and SA was found to be partially at fault, those assets would simply be seized by the U.S. Federal Government.

We certainly live in interesting times.


The report, published by Sandler Research, says that demand for surveillance drones is driving growth, with new systems that deploy water canons to “handle large crowds and demonstration(s)” also proving popular.

Riot control systems are expected to “generate revenues of over USD 3.5 billion by the end of 2020,” with North America being one of the primary growth areas for upgraded weapons due to “militarization of the police department and other law enforcement agencies” in the aftermath of the 2014 riots in Ferguson, Missouri.

Purchases of long-range acoustic devices, whips, batons and armored vehicles that will be used to “disperse, control, and arrest people involved in riots and protests” are also on the increase.

“Demand for such equipment is expected to rise during the next few years,” states the report, with authorities in Iran, Egypt, Russia, China, and Thailand also spending increased amounts on riot control equipment in advance of potential social disorder.

Golly, it’s almost as if there’s a “global plan” to disrupt the citizenry.  I’m sure our wise overlords in government won’t take advantage of that for their own gain.

An addendum..

Get those 28 pages declassified.  You can use that site to find out if your representative was a co-sponsor of the bill.  If they are, email/call to thank them and urge them to keep fighting.  If they haven’t, email/call to tell them they’d better do the right goddamn thing and vote to declassify those pages.

Bipartisanship Breaks Out to Block 9/11 Bill – Roll Call

A Senate bill that would allow families of those killed in the 9/11 attacks to sue the Saudi government has achieved a rare Washington distinction, by uniting the Obama administration and some of its fiercest GOP critics.

President Barack Obama, Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., are rallying to kill the bipartisan plan that would make it possible for American citizens to sue foreign governments believed to be linked to terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest warned the legislation could lead other countries to craft even broader versions that could do significant harm to the U.S. government.

“It certainly is plausible … that that other countries when they’re implementing these laws would not tailor them so specifically,” Earnest said. “And that does open up the United States to a unique degree of risk, and putting our country, our taxpayers, our service members and our diplomats in legal jeopardy in that way is contrary to our interests.”

Earnest said it would be “unwise” for the Senate to pass the legislation, “particularly when there is an alternative mechanism for us to resolve these kinds of issues with other countries.”

That alternative, he said, is “the essence of diplomacy.”

Shortly before Earnest appeared in the White House briefing room, Ryan spoke out against the so-called ‘9/11 bill.’

“I think we need to look at it,” Ryan told reporters at the Capitol. “I think we need to review it to make sure we are not making mistakes with our allies and that we’re not catching people in this that shouldn’t be caught up in this.

On a related note, Reid said that he supported the position of members of the independent, bipartisan commission that investigated the attacks, who want to see 28 pages of their report that remain classified be made public. The material is believed to draw a picture of foreign support for the 9/11 hijackers.


As I have said many, many times:  There is always bipartisanship when at least one of two conditions are met:

  1. They think the American people either aren’t looking or the legislation at hand is too complex for the average citizen to bother understanding.
  2. When there’s an opportunity to move the globalist agenda forward OR that agenda is threatened.

It’s safe to say that the American people receiving the first real information on 9/11 since the event could be a serious hindrance to the current puppet government.  But I digress.

I was unfortunately too busy to post about this over the weekend.  But to say that I’m stunned that there’s genuine support within Congress to declassify the mythical 28 pages is the greatest understatement ever posted on this blog.  Utterly stunned.

But let’s be sober in our thinking here:  We’re not going to get the full truth.  We’re never going to see declassified documents that show elements across the spectrum of the United States Federal Government having advance knowledge.  We’re never going to see documents showing those same elements preparing to use that horrific tragedy to forward a sick, grotesque agenda of destabilization in the Middle East and the destruction of personal liberties in the United States.  But we might just manage to get a shred of truth that shows Saudi Arabia funding these attackers.

I don’t think many people in this country have even a basic understanding of the U.S./Saudi relationship.  At best I would guess that most people with any familiarity simply believe that we’re close allies.  I suppose that’s true in a way.  But there’s that old saying about being judged by the company you keep, and Saudi Arabia is a cancer infecting the planet.  Worse, they have enormous levels of influence on the United States government.  I can confidently say that no other country on the planet has as much influence within the United States government.

I could post pages upon pages about this subject but for now, please follow this story.  Call your senator and congressman and tell them to support the declassification of the 28 pages.  WE FUCKING DESERVE TO HEAR THE TRUTH (or as much of it as we can get) ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED ON 9/11.  This country has never been the same since that day.  We’ll never see those days again unless we know what really happened.



Cruz, Hannity Spar Over Delegates: ‘The Only People Asking This Question Are the Hardcore Donald Trump Supporters’ – Breitbart

GOP presidential candidate Texas Senator  Ted Cruz (R-TX)  and talk radio and Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity engaged in a testy exchange over the delegate process on Hannity’s radio show on Tuesday.

Hannity began the interview by asking, “I think the number one question on the minds of Republicans right now is what is going on with the delegates. For example, if you can explain to people that your campaign, that you have every right, within the rules, to talk to candidates, that are pledged on a first ballot, to candidate A or candidate C, you being candidate B. And that — tell us what that process is.”

Cruz answered that isn’t what people are concerned about, and are instead concerned about policy issues and beating Democratic candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Cruz further stated that “the media loves to obsess about process. This process, and this whining from the Trump campaign is all silly. It’s very, very simple –.”

Hannity then cut in to say, “I’m on social media, with millions of people. I have 550 radio stations. And I have the top-rated cable in my hour, all across the board. And I am telling you, that people are telling me, that they find this whole process confusing.” He further stated that this wasn’t a “process question. It’s an integrity of the election question. And everybody’s asking me this question. So, I want — I’m giving you an opportunity to explain it.”

Cruz responded, “Sean, the only people asking this question, are the hardcore Donald Trump supporters.” Hannity again cut in to ask, “Senator, why do you this? Every single time you…you’ve got to stop. Every time I have you on the air, and I ask a legitimate question, you try to throw this in my face. I’m getting sick of it. I’ve had you on more than any other candidate, on radio and TV. So, if I ask you, Senator, a legitimate question to explain to the audience, why don’t you just answer it?”

Canadian Teddy won’t answer it because if more people knew what he was doing, they’d burn the RNC down.  They still might.

Teddy is playing the saddest role of them all.  He’s the kid that the cool kids bully the shit out of but at some point in our story, he becomes useful to the bullies.  So the bullies use him to play a mean old prank on the class president.  And the saddest part is that the whole time, that bullied little kid thinks the bullies will reward him when it’s all over.

Teddy really believes that if he can steal enough delegates and give the RNC enough cover to declare a contested convention, they’re going to reward him with the nomination.  But they hate you, Teddy and if they ever respected you, they sure as fuck don’t now.

But Teddy will keep playing his surprisingly large part in destroying what’s left of the Republic while continuing the proud tradition of men who are not eligible to be President doing enormous damage to that very office.