How they separate your vote from power.

Two terms to become familiar with if you’re not already:  “Brokered Convention” and “Super Delegates”.  These are the two tools that the Republicans and Democrats use to separate your vote from democracy.

On the Democrat side, we have Super Delegates.  They’ve existed since the early 70’s but the majority of Democrat voters either haven’t heard of them or if they have, they aren’t familiar with their function.  Don’t be too hard on Democrat voters for not being familiar with Super Delgates, they’re comprised of a 90/10 mix of low information voters and hopeful communists.

A Super Delegate is an unelected delegate who ultimately decides who is nominated for President from the party.  Super Delegates are not elected and are under no obligation of any kind as to whom they vote for.  All the news networks talk about the Delegate count between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton but the Delegate count is a charade.  It is an utterly meaningless factoid.  Don’t believe me?  Despite the close race between Sanders and Clinton, Clinton leads the all-important Super Delegate race by 502 to 70.

So the way I’m describing these Super Delegates, you’re probably thinking to yourself “Mr. Sasshole, the way you’re describing this makes it sound like the whole primary process for the Democrat party is meaningless and the nomination just comes down to the whims of around two thousand people that can do whatever they want.”  That is about 99% correct, believe it or not.  The 1% where you’re wrong is that if Sanders wins the delegate count or can at least make it close, his supporters might make a big enough stink that the will of the people won’t be completely subverted.   That’s an enormous “if”, however.  Nobody plays dirty pool like the Democrats and it gets even worse when they’re fighting each other.  Do some research on the 2008 Democrat primary between Obama and Hillary.

On the Republican side, we don’t have SD’s, but we do have a thing called a “Brokered Convention”.  But before just giving you a definition, let me explain the RNC’s (and the billionaire psychopaths that control them) plan to invoke a brokered convention.

The key to achieving a Brokered Convention is to have a situation where no candidate has a clear majority of the delegates by the end of Primary season.  To do that, they need to dilute the delegate pool.  The plan to do so, as told to me by someone who works in D.C. is as follows:

-The RNC is going to pour in money and support behind John Kasich for the Michigan and Ohio primaries.  Kasich has  significant support in Michigan and being the governor of Ohio, has a high degree of support there.  The hope is that he can steal a win in one of these two states and perhaps a 2nd place finish in the other.

-With Jeb Bush dropping out to spend time golfing and eating live puppies with the rest of his crime family, Rubio has a much clearer path to Florida.  The RNC pours on the money and support for Rubio in Florida.

-In Texas, Cruz has significant support since he’s their Senator.  RNC will hold their nose and spend a lot of money for Ted Cruz to try to take Texas.

Notice that there’s nobody that the RNC is outwardly favoring with this strategy.  It’s simply the “Anyone but Trump” strategy.  As I mentioned in a previous post, we haven’t had a President with no strings since JFK (and to a lesser degree, Ronald Reagan) and the thought of a sovereign President of the United States is utterly unthinkable to the Globalists.  That being said, despite the RNC not favoring a single candidate with their support with this “Anyone but Trump plan”, make NO mistake:  Rubio is their boy.  He is the RNC Establishment Nazi butt boy of their dreams for 2016 now that Jeb is out.  But that’s a separate post for a separate day.

Once they have the votes diluted and nobody (especially Trump) has a clear majority, the Republicans can invoke a “Brokered Convention”.  All those delegates that have already voted in the primaries are “released” from their vote and their obligations.  Their connection to the will of the people who voted in the Republican primaries has been officially severed.  They can now “re-vote” on the spot.  This is a small pool of people, easy to be coerced, intimidated or bought off.




Dementia cure may be just five years away, says world expert – London Telegraph

A cure for dementia could be found within five years, the leader of the global council on the disease has said.

Dr Dennis Gillings, outgoing chairman of the World Dementia Council, said recent scientific progress had surpassed his expectations, with two potential breakthroughs now on the horizon.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, he was “optimistic” that treatments which could remove the plaques in the brain associated with dementia, and those to unscramble the neural tangles which characterise the disease might be developed as soon as 2020.

A dear friend has a family history of this issue and consequently, I can’t help but pay attention to any and all information related to cognitive decline diseases.  Perhaps there’s a chance that my son’s generation will never know what it’s like to lose a parent to thise problem.

The United States has now gone a record 10 straight years without 3 percent growth in real Gross Domestic Product, according to data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The BEA has calculated GDP for each year going back to 1929 and it has calculated the inflation-adjusted annual change in GDP (in constant 2009 dollars) from 1930 forward.

In the 85 years for which BEA has calculated the annual change in real GDP there is only one ten-year stretch—2006 through 2015—when the annual growth in real GDP never hit 3 percent. During the last ten years, real annual growth in GDP peaked in 2006 at 2.7 percent. It has never been that high again, according to the BEA.

We’re still in the middle of a great depression.  But we’ve learned something new during this time;  A country can have a bad economy but the President can just say that things are going great, and almost half the population will take his word over what they see every day.

Listen to what one of Hillary’s former staff members has to say about her:

Former Hillary Insider Now Supports Trump – Infowars

I don’t care for the headline as his support of Trump isn’t really the story.  This is a man who busted his backside for Hillary Clinton and he completely indicts the Clintons, Obama and both political parties.

An education on the grand game being played…

A few months ago, a brilliant youtube blogger with the moniker “Redsilverj” broke from his usual 5-10 minute topical videos and produced a proper 90 minute documentary on the history of both the outside influences on our government and the game being played by our two-party system.

I don’t expect many of you to check this out because of the length of the film, but if just a few of you do it will have been worth posting.  It also paints Trump in a different light because it’s becoming more and more obvious that he stands outside this paradigm.  Remember Emma Goldman’s words when you watch this film:  “If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.”

Redsilverj – An American History


They’re not even trying to hide it any longer..

Expect a “stuffed” crowd tonight at the Republican debate.  By stuffed, I mean stuffed with “open border” plants in the crowd.

The kicker is that it’s not CNN doing it this time (although I imagine they’ve given it their blessing), it’s the RNC.


This is an example of a previous casting call with the money coming from the RNC.  Tonight is no different.

Guys, you might not like what Trump has to say some of the time, but the forces organizing against him should tell you one very important (perhaps the most important) thing:  This man has no strings.  We haven’t had a President of this country with no strings since November 22nd, 1963.





24 Years Later, Joe Biden’s Words Haunt Democrats – NY Times

When you are as voluble as Joseph R. Biden Jr. is, you are bound to say more than a few words that come back to haunt you. And some choice ones returned with a vengeance on Monday as the fight over the open Supreme Court seat began in the Senate.

As Democrats prepared to lay into Republicans for vowing to stall any nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, Republicans instead pounded them with remarks that Mr. Biden made as a senator in June 1992. In a Senate floor speech resurfaced by C-Span, he said he would do almost exactly what Democrats are now criticizing Republicans for promising to do — not even hold a nomination hearing if the president put forward a Supreme Court candidate.

Republicans and conservative activists pounced on the gift, enshrining as the new “Biden Rules” his declaration that a hearing in the heat of the “political season” would be too damaging for the nominee, the Senate and the nation.

Idiot Joey is the gift that keeps on giving.  Although honestly, I’m genuinely shocked that the NY Times even reported this.  I figured between Joe’s statement from 24 years ago, Obama’s statement during his partial term as a senator and the Democrat-led Senate resolution in 1960, we wouldn’t hear a peep about any of them except on alternative and conservative news sites.

From Bret Easton Ellis’ Twitter feed:


It’s items like this that make me think that if Trump can somehow get the nomination (an enormous IF), he’ll crush either Clinton or Comrade Sanders.  The polling looks close, but that’s because people aren’t willing to be honest about intending to vote for Trump because of the political/social climate.  Then once they’re in the polling booth, they can vote in privacy.

But even then, Trump will have to win by an overwhelming margin for it to be close (if that makes any sense).