No ‘Dumping’

Obama acts to protect workers from ObamaCare. – WSJ

The word that got our attention, though, is dump. It appears in the headline, too: “I.R.S. Bars Employers From Dumping Workers Into Health Exchanges.” If the New York Times were our only source of news, we’d be very confused right now. (Well, OK, we’d be very confused almost always.) For months the Times has been touting the quality of ObamaCare policies, scoffing at those who liked their previous plans and were victimized by President Obama’s fraudulent promise that they could keep them.

Now all of a sudden the exchanges are a garbage dump? Or is it that the exchanges are a pristine wilderness into which workers are the garbage being dumped?

The Times quotes Obama at a February press conference: “I don’t think that an employer-based system is going to be, or should be, replaced anytime soon,” he said when a reporter asked “whether over the long term you see a future where health insurance is less tied to the workplace.”

You can see why the president would take that position. If employers start dropping medical benefits, the number of people directly victimized by the you-can-keep-your-plan fraud would multiply, and with it Obama and the Democrats’ political problems. Thus the administration is in the ironic position of writing regulations to make sure its “comprehensive reform” isn’t too comprehensive.

At least the NY Times is being honest about the health care plans from the Exchanges being shit.  Honesty is difficult for them so let’s give them their due credit.

I also like the phrase “the number of people directly victimized by the you-can-keep-your-plan fraud..”.  Victimized is a good description for what this Administration has done towards the people of this country.

Obamacare:  A health plan so fantastic that the President exempted all of his political constituencies from it until the elections are over.