What’s really happening.

Egypt has a 60% illiteracy rate. Internet access is rare and when it is present, it’s heavily censored. Yet, the narrative that the Media and the White House has created is that an old, not new, anti-Muhammed Youtube video is to blame for attacks on our Libyan and Benghazi embassy.

What’s actually going on:

This is another chapter in Obama’s quest to dramatically reshape the geopolitics of the Middle East with the endgame being an Islamic caliphate that dominates the region. One doesn’t need a strong imagination to know what that means for Israel.
Any of you questioning this statement need to wake the fuck up.

-The State Department actively supported the Muslim Brotherhood’s coup of Egypt. Mubarak and Egypt was our closest ally in the Middle East. We provided money and arms to the “rebels” and now we continue to send Billions to the new government in an effort to both support them and bribe them. For those of you who don’t pay attention, the Muslim Brotherhood support Sharia Law and has close ties to Al Queda, Hezbolla and Hamas. Yes, we send them billions and it’s all official.

-The State Department pushed for elections immediately after Mubarak was removed from power despite the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood was the only group organized enough to provide candidates and a campaign infrastructure. We knew what the outcome would be.

-We supported the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Queda in removing Khaddafi. The end result was of course, the same as Egypt.

-Regardless of your opinion of Israel, it cannot be denied that our current President has the coldest relationship with Israel of any President since the yount country’s creation. Obama has publicly rebuked Israel and it’s PM more than any President in my lifetime.

Even without insider information, even without researching in the public domain for the numerous ties between the Muslim Brotherhood and both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, you should be able to see what’s happening.

A two year old film didn’t whip up this utter chaos. The White House directly incited this chaos with the goal of curbing both the 1st Amendment and lighting the fuse for a major conflict in the Middle East.  The only reason things weren’t worse is because many of the people paid to riot did not.

Look at the picture below.

This is one of the men that made the aforementioned film. The key bit from the L.A. Times article:

“Just after midnight Saturday morning, authorities descended on the Cerritos home of the man believed to be the filmmaker behind the anti-Muslim movie that has sparked protests and rioting in the Muslim world.”

How did Obama respond to the turmoil in the Middle East that he created? By sending enforcers to collect a man in the middle of the night whose only “crime” is embarassing the President. More specifically, he dared to exercise his 1st Amendment rights. The message is all of this is clear: You WILL not speak badly of Muslims in this country.   The 1st amendment ends where they begin.

Remember when I said a couple weeks back “None of it is real”? Here we are. There’s almost certainly more to come.

You are not FREE when police can come to your door in the middle of the night and take you downtown because of a film you made.


I can’t write anything meaningful about this anniversary.  I don’t have the skill nor do I have the ability to distance myself from the things I know about that day that I cannot share.  It’s impossible to separate the two.   

Last year I wrote about how this day beat us.  I wrote that we traded our country that day for today’s police state.  That we gave up what made this country unique in the name of fear.  Nothing in the last 365 days has changed my mind about that.  

The day it happened was an odd juxtaposition.  I had just gotten back from a trip to Vegas with a group of very pretty friends, one of whom would eventually become my wife.  I was newly single and still basking in the afterglow of a fun and emotionally exciting trip.  We didn’t have cable yet at the office so we huddled around a television that was barely able to display a recognizable picture of the event.  The entire time I kept thinking “I was just in Vegas.  I was just having the time of my life.”  A personal way of saying “I’m not here, this isn’t happening” I suppose.

A couple years after the event, a local writer wrote what I believe is a very personal and moving essay.  It’s well worth your time to read it: http://www.lileks.com/bleats/archive/03/0903/091103.html

A Challenge and a Question

A friend sent me an email last night challenging me on my assertion that Presidents are selected, not elected.

I was always taught that it’s rude to respond to a question with a question… But I’m a rude boy.  

Go back to the primaries.  Think of the Republicans and Independents that you might have chatted with.  Do you know anyone… anyone at all who said anything along the lines of “Mitt Romney is my man.” ?

I’ll go a step further.  I visit in excess of 30 news sites/blogs a day with about a 50/50 split between conservative/commu-…Liberal.  Anyhoo, I never once saw a conservative or Libertarian commentator say that Romney was her/his choice for the nomination.  At three different points, I went searching for a conservative blog somewhere who endorsed Romney as their choice for the nomination.  Couldn’t find a one.

Now, I can’t post many of the things I’ve seen and been told.  And yes, I recognize that my above example is an imperfect one, but at the very least I hope I’ve planted some kind of seed among the more conservative readers here.

You should be very nervous about President Romney.

Rights lost.

John Cusack (the actor) has been outspoken about politics off and on for the last decade.  His articles and comments have painted him as a rather shrill Leftist.  However, to his great credit, he’s one of the few Leftists in this country that hasn’t buried his head in the sand to avoid seeing the war that President Obama has waged on civil rights in this country.  Now, the Republicans deserve plenty of blame for ignoring the erosion of our civil rights during his eight years in office, but the amount of liberty lost during his two terms pales in comparison to what we’ve weathered in the past three and a half years.  All the while Dems are silent.   Obama and Holder would never abuse their powers, war is now cool, nobody is dying in Afghanistan and poverty has been eliminated.

Cusack recently posted an interview he did with law professor Jonathan Turley entitled “The Obama Administration’s War on the Constitution”.    This is a long article but you must read it.  If your attention span doesn’t permit a single sitting, break it up.. But read the damn thing.


Now for all you Republicans out there, I have a final question that I know I’ve asked before.  At any point during the campaign, have you ever heard Romney or Ryan say a single critical word about the Imperial nature of this president?  Anything about regaining civil rights?  I didn’t think so.  It’s all about the economy, the economy and the economy.

The current economic depression and the oncoming collapse or no different than flying planes into buildings.  Get your attention focused on the catastrophe while they enslave you.

You Republicans had better be damn vigilant the next four years and resist the temptation to breathe a sigh of relief once Obama is gone.

God is dead.

As I wait for more info (and make sense of the info I have), I wanted to post this video.  Bret Baier (who manages to be unflappable) asks Dick Durbin (the Majority Whip in the Senate) about two items in the newly released Democratic platform.  The two items are specifically:  1) No mention of God in the platform.  2) No mention of acknowledging Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.   The removal of these two planks is unprecedented.

I’m not religious and at best, I’m deist.  But it is bothersome (albeit not surprising) to see a major political party eliminate any mention of a higher power.  The Christian and Jewish faiths are an immensely powerful force for good in this country.   The second item while disturbing is less unexpected.  Low, to medium grade Antisemitism has been part of the Democratic party for well in excess of a decade now.

For those of you out there who are Catholic and typically (or exclusively) vote Democrat, what do you think of this?  Especially in light of this administration’s past attacks on Catholicism.

I’m having difficulties embedding video with WordPress so you can view the video at the bottom of this page.

All the noise noise noise noise noise.

At last count, I’ve trashed 7 posts that were written for this blog due to conflicting information.  As I believe I’ve mentioned before, I have two high level sources that have kept me informed on all matters POTUS the past couple of years and rare has been the day where the information wasn’t corroborative.

That has suddenly changed and it’s scary considering how enormously high the stakes are for us.

So, on to it I guess.  I’m hearing that the Obama administration has conceded the upcoming election.  This makes lots of sense in some ways and zero sense in others.

Why it makes sense:

1. The current public polling is a sham.  The most accurate poll (Rassmussen) shows Romney currently leading by +4 points after a post convention bounce.  The real, internal polling that both camps have access to shows Romney up nationally 12-14 points.  This is an insurmountable lead that even the large scale voting fraud that is planned cannot negate.

2. Obama despises his job.  I have to remind you that any conjecture on this blog is always labeled as such.  This is not conjecture.  He despises Washington and how Washington works.  He believes that his ideas are obviously correct and he should not have to engage in the usual pressing of the flesh with both parties that’s been de rigueur for presidents in the past.  The President’s schedule is posted each day on the White House website.  Have a look at the archives.  This is a man who spends most of the day sequestered in his upper floor office, watching ESPN.  And no, that’s not conjecture.

3.  With the exception of Executive orders, Obama would be largely impotent in his second term.  Anyone who has spent time researching geopolitics and history knows that for quite some time, Presidents have been selected, not elected by a small group of very powerful people.  While it may comfort you to dismiss this as “tinfoil hat” talk, it’s true nonetheless.  Given the current climate of polarization and given the kind of campaign the Obama team is running, a victory in November would leave him unable to govern.  Democrats have sadly turned a blind eye to the actions of this man but Conservatives, Libertarians and Independents have not.  Add a very likely Republican controlled Senate and much of his power will be neutralized.

4.  Speculative: Obama has already done much of what he was sent to do.  Civil liberties, already severely weakened by 8 years of George Bush have been demolished under less than four years of Obama.  Perhaps “they” are satisfied with the progress that’s been made.

5.  The Globalists have abandoned him.  He is considered damaged goods.  While I’ve seen detailed evidence of this, there’s plenty of it in the public domain.  George Soros donated tens of millions of dollars both above and below the table in 2008.  He is a man committed to reducing America to just another country at the table of nations.  Yet, he’s silent.  No interviews, no money donated either legally or illegally.  However, I do not know how this was arrived at.  Do the globalists consider him to be ineffective now because Obama has tipped his hand so obviously to his Marxist ethos?  Did they want him to move even faster?  Are they convinced that the numerous and enormous scandals that Holder has been able to hold at bay will finally become uncaged in a 2nd term?  Once again, the abandonment is not speculation.  The reasons for it are.

6. He is being blackmailed with a recording that illustrates a close relationship with an extremely controversial figure. I will not elaborate on this now or in the future.

7.  A personal friend of the Obama’s is soliciting donations from powerful Chicagoans to purchase a 35 million dollar piece of property in Hawaii to use as their new home in January.  This did not originally come from one of my sources and when asked to verify, they could neither confirm nor deny.  This information does come from a Chicago native with an excellent track record of previous insider knowledge.  Needless to say, I must re-emphasize, this does not come from my sources, nor has it been confirmed by them.

Why it doesn’t make sense:

1.  There is an  enormous investment in Obama by both Globalists and Chicago Polit-thugs.  It’s almost impossible for me to wrap my head around the idea that they would give up against a rather weak Republican candidate.  Over twenty years have been spent grooming this man and his agenda to become POTUS.  The power of the Executive branch has grown enormously during his term and even with a hostile Republican congress, Obama could still continue to implement his Masters’ agenda.

2.  It’s simply not in his nature.  If you have spent any amount of time researching this man’s life, you know that this man truly believes that it is his divine right to wield the power of the Presidency.  Every step of his political career has been taken with his ascension to the Presidency in mind.   This man cannot lose because he is everyone’s Better.

3. Valerie Jarrett.  See item #2.

4.  A mechanism allowing an enormous degree of voter fraud is still in tact and moving forward.

5.  Head of the Fed, Ben Bernanke initiated Quantitative Easing #3 today.  Ben is ALL IN for Barry.  You literally got poorer today so that the economy can avoid its inevitable crash for another six months (if that) instead of in two months.  Not all the globalists have given up, clearly.




The other possibility is that Romney has promised to continue the Globalists’ agenda in a more subtle fashion.  Those of you who can’t wait to vote for him should ask themselves a question:  Have you ever heard either Romney or Ryan utter a single word of concern over our rapidly disappearing civil liberties?  No?  You haven’t heard those words because they haven’t been said.

Republicans, you’ve done a far better job than the Democrats at holding your officials accountable.  The Tea Party has removed many a Republican who has lied about being fiscally responsible.  But what about turning a blind eye to Bush’s spending and assault on our civil rights for 8 years?  Yes, I know.. there was a very vocal faction.  But the bottom line is, it hasn’t been enough and it still isn’t enough.

We all know that if Romney wins, in the span of a single day, things will change for the Liberals and the Media of this country:

-War is no longer cool.

-The plight of the elderly due to savings rates being less than 1% will suddenly become a tragedy.

-Current gas prices are suddenly an enormous burden on the poor and lower class.

-The real unemployment rate will be reported on by the media rather than the faux rate that’s continually bandied about by the media.

-A daily body count of dead American soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan and the five other ground engagements that Obama ordered will again become a daily occurrence after disappearing for the past four years.

And so on and so forth.  It will be easy for Republicans and even some independents and Libertarians to simply tune out future misdeeds by Romney due to the nauseating levels of hypocrisy by Liberals.  But you can’t let that happen.  Presidents haven’t been voted in for many, many years.  They are selected and there’s a significant amount of evidence pointing to Romney being selected this November.

He’s not your friend.  He’s not a great president just because the current one is a communist.  He’s your employee and there isn’t a labor union for Presidents of the United States.  So you can and must hold him accountable.